SECTION II THREE FUTURES

THE
SCENARIOS.

Five configurations of the same three variables. Each plugs into the bounded revenue function. The math is mechanical; the implications are conditional on whether a coupling shock fires.

Unemployment
4.0%
Inflation
3.0%
Avg Rate
3.3%

The starting position, anchored to FY2024 actuals. Unemployment near full employment, post-2022 inflation drifting toward target, and a weighted-average rate on debt held by the public of ~3.3%. Static debt service consumes 21.3% of federal receipts — inside the sustainable band but approaching the 0.30 threshold. Over three years of conditions persisting, the ratio drifts up to 0.26 from baseline structural deficit alone, without any coupling shock. The system has headroom; it does not have much.

Inner stress factor
inner = max(0, 1 − 0.05·4.0 − 0.04·(3.0−2.0))
inner = max(0, 1 − 0.20 − 0.04) = 0.76
Revenue Y(u,i)
Y = $4.92T × [0.55 + 0.45 × 0.76]
Y = $4.92T × 0.892 = $4.39T
Static debt service
DS = $28.3T × 3.3% = $0.93T
Crisis Ratio = $0.93T ÷ $4.39T = 0.213
+3y projection
D(3) = $28.3T + 3·(2.0 + 0.2·max(0, 4.0−4.0))
D(3) = $28.3T + 3·$2.0T = $34.3T
DS(3) = $34.3T × 3.3% = $1.13T
Crisis Ratio(3) = $1.13T ÷ $4.39T = 0.258
Unemployment
6.5%
Inflation
3.5%
Avg Rate
4.5%

A partial coupling fires. AI-driven displacement raises unemployment by 2.5 points above the natural rate; inflation drifts up modestly; the rollover stack reprices to a 4.5% weighted average. Static debt service consumes 31.3% of federal receipts — across the IMF stress line. Three years of these conditions push the ratio to 0.40, with the cyclical addition to deficit growth ($0.5T/yr) compounding the structural baseline. The conventional response options narrow but do not vanish.

Inner stress factor
inner = max(0, 1 − 0.05·6.5 − 0.04·(3.5−2.0))
inner = max(0, 1 − 0.325 − 0.06) = 0.615
Revenue Y(u,i)
Y = $4.92T × [0.55 + 0.45 × 0.615]
Y = $4.92T × 0.827 = $4.07T
Static debt service
DS = $28.3T × 4.5% = $1.27T
Crisis Ratio = $1.27T ÷ $4.07T = 0.313
+3y projection
D(3) = $28.3T + 3·(2.0 + 0.2·max(0, 6.5−4.0))
D(3) = $28.3T + 3·$2.5T = $35.8T
DS(3) = $35.8T × 4.5% = $1.61T
Crisis Ratio(3) = $1.61T ÷ $4.07T = 0.396
Unemployment
8.0%
Inflation
4.5%
Avg Rate
5.5%

Recession-level unemployment combines with stubborn inflation as the Fed faces the trap: hike to tame prices and accelerate fiscal compression; cut to ease debt service and let inflation run. The weighted-average rate climbs to 5.5%. Static debt service consumes 40.8% of federal receipts; three years of these conditions push the ratio past 0.50 as the deficit grows by $2.8T per year. Non-mandatory spending becomes the adjustment variable; there is no plausible Congressional path that closes a gap of this scale without monetary accommodation, restructuring, or both.

Inner stress factor
inner = max(0, 1 − 0.05·8.0 − 0.04·(4.5−2.0))
inner = max(0, 1 − 0.40 − 0.10) = 0.50
Revenue Y(u,i)
Y = $4.92T × [0.55 + 0.45 × 0.50]
Y = $4.92T × 0.775 = $3.81T
Static debt service
DS = $28.3T × 5.5% = $1.56T
Crisis Ratio = $1.56T ÷ $3.81T = 0.408
+3y projection
D(3) = $28.3T + 3·(2.0 + 0.2·max(0, 8.0−4.0))
D(3) = $28.3T + 3·$2.8T = $36.7T
DS(3) = $36.7T × 5.5% = $2.02T
Crisis Ratio(3) = $2.02T ÷ $3.81T = 0.529
Unemployment
10.0%
Inflation
5.0%
Avg Rate
6.5%

Great-Recession-level unemployment with inflation that refuses to normalize. The weighted-average rate has climbed to 6.5% as the rollover stack reprices through a stress cycle. Static debt service consumes more than half of every federal dollar collected; after three years of these conditions, the ratio approaches 0.70, with debt growing by $3.2T per year. Non-mandatory spending is crowded out; rollover risk dominates the policy conversation. The conventional fiscal response cannot close the gap.

Inner stress factor
inner = max(0, 1 − 0.05·10.0 − 0.04·(5.0−2.0))
inner = max(0, 1 − 0.50 − 0.12) = 0.38
Revenue Y(u,i)
Y = $4.92T × [0.55 + 0.45 × 0.38]
Y = $4.92T × 0.721 = $3.55T
Static debt service
DS = $28.3T × 6.5% = $1.84T
Crisis Ratio = $1.84T ÷ $3.55T = 0.519
+3y projection
D(3) = $28.3T + 3·(2.0 + 0.2·max(0, 10.0−4.0))
D(3) = $28.3T + 3·$3.2T = $37.9T
DS(3) = $37.9T × 6.5% = $2.46T
Crisis Ratio(3) = $2.46T ÷ $3.55T = 0.694
Unemployment
12.0%
Inflation
6.0%
Avg Rate
8.0%

Every variable pushed to a level worse than anything since the early 1980s. AI displacement, persistent inflation, and a credibility event on Treasuries push the weighted-average rate to 8%. The bounded revenue function does its job: receipts approach the structural floor smoothly, settling at $3.24T. Static debt service consumes 69.9% of available receipts; three years of these conditions push the ratio to 0.966 — borrowing finances borrowing. The model has not broken; the system has. This is the boundary of the regime where conventional fiscal policy applies.

Inner stress factor
inner = max(0, 1 − 0.05·12.0 − 0.04·(6.0−2.0))
inner = max(0, 1 − 0.60 − 0.16) = 0.24
Revenue Y(u,i)
Y = $4.92T × [0.55 + 0.45 × 0.24]
Y = $4.92T × 0.658 = $3.24T
Static debt service
DS = $28.3T × 8.0% = $2.26T
Crisis Ratio = $2.26T ÷ $3.24T = 0.699
+3y projection
D(3) = $28.3T + 3·(2.0 + 0.2·max(0, 12.0−4.0))
D(3) = $28.3T + 3·$3.6T = $39.1T
DS(3) = $39.1T × 8.0% = $3.13T
Crisis Ratio(3) = $3.13T ÷ $3.24T = 0.966

RETURN TO THE LIVE MODEL

Adjust the variables yourself. The math doesn't care which scenario you prefer.

← Open Calculator